Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:35
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Vikings Agree to Terms on Josh Oliver Contract Extension - Minnesota Vikings
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How do legitimate BPO companies find and secure clients without using social media?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
'28 Years Later' Marketing Hid Mother-Son Tearjerker Due to Studio Worries - Variety
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
15 Retinol-Rich Foods To Stimulate Collagen - Vogue
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How was your JEE 2024 result like?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Athletics' Denzel Clarke leaps over wall to rob Angels' HR for incredible catch - ESPN